pheran
regular
Reged: 23/09/2002
Posts: 2615
Loc: Home Berkshire, boat in Hollan...
|
|
I suspect its been asked many times before but I've looked but can't find the answer. Why can't you simply paste an image into a new post? As it is you have to upload it to an image hosting site, quote its URL, then ybw has to whizz away and retrieve it. I assume that this saves ybw some storage space but in these days of low cost mass storage, I wonder if there is some other reason. Can someone 'deconfuse' me please?
--------------------
What is written without effort is in general read without pleasure." (Samuel Johnson.)
|
rickp
regular
Reged: 10/11/2002
Posts: 5361
|
|
I imagine its less about the storage and more about the bandwidth costs of delivering said images & dealing with dodgy images (and copyright lawyers, etc etc). Besides - when there are so many free sites for hosting photos, why bother trying to replicate someone elses core competancy?
Rick
|
BrendanS
regular
Reged: 11/06/2002
Posts: 36822
Loc: Me: Wilts. Boat: Lymington
|
|
What would be good though is if someone could write a utility to do the business automatically.
Flock browser already will upload to photobucket any pictures you drag and drop onto the Flock auto uploader, into any directory in photobucket account you have access and password to (one time setup). If you could combine that with a utility to take the photobucket image tagged url for each pic, and load into a ybw post, everyone would be onto a winner.
--------------------
See http://www.frappr.com/ybw to add yourself to the forum map
and as everyone else is doing it
www.plaintalkconsulting.co.uk
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
