DaCostaLot
regular
Reged: 25/01/2006
Posts: 392
Loc: Hampshire, Wickham
|
|
Further to the publication of a couple of Mags this month, which exclude certain boats, I am dismayed at the effort to publicise diesel/eco friendly boats.
Surely, with the inevitable, the Mags should support this new wave of boats, which eat/drink less fuel - the fuel will go up at some point, whatever anyone does or says.
This lack of support for boats that drink less fuel and DO NOT compromise on looks (which is what everyone moans about) is ridiculous. Maybe the buying public should wake up to this and realise that fuel, although it has lots of support will rise in price - we all know the government don't listen, even when they do, they "smile and nod", just like I do in meetings!! then nothing gets done, just like after the meeting!!
I do not WANT prices to rise, I think it is in the next couple of years, inevitable. I just think that companies such as MotorCats, EcoCats, PowerCats and such like, who are trying to relieve the pressure on the buyers by creating great ideas (not always good looking) and manufacturing them at semi-reasonable prices. The money that is saved in the long run - especially as fuel will go up, will be fantastic - may be worth the investment.
If fuel goes up the whole boat building ethic will change towards lighter built (flimsy) monohulls or Moterised Catamarans.
IMHO, what do you think???
--------------------
Have a Look!! www.ribcats.com or www.sailroom.co.uk
|
rickp
regular
Reged: 10/11/2002
Posts: 5449
|
|
It amuses me that you think the magazines set the agenda. Surely its the boat buying public that set the agenda - if there were hundreds of cats being bought then the magazines would follow? I think you're confusing the (lack of) coverage of a small boat builder as the mags ignoring cats - which can't be true as I've seen reviews of cats in recent editions of mby I think.
It also amuses me that you think the market will change dramatically if diesel goes up in price. Its doubled in a year and things haven't changed. Its taxed in most of Europe and there market doesn't seem to have beaten a path to your door...
Rick
|
Andrew_Fanner
regular
Reged: 13/03/2002
Posts: 5600
Loc: ked into poverty by children
|
|
If you can afford a new boat you can afford to fuel your exisitng one may be pertinent, in the way that Rolls Royce traditionally are held to advise that if you need to know the cost of ownership you can't afford one. The older and cheaper end of the market, who might be more critically interested in lower fuel costs, are not likely to scrape up the £60K or so that a new MotorCat or similar will cost.
Now if they want to give me one I'll extol it to the heights because, like many river boaters, I do want low wash at 4 knots and achievable 15+ knots when downstream of Tilbury. But I would get shafted by the EA on licence fees, although I could claim to be rafting up with myself (pretty kinky eh?)
--------------------
Two beers please, my friend is paying.
|
DaCostaLot
regular
Reged: 25/01/2006
Posts: 392
Loc: Hampshire, Wickham
|
|
Rich,
It is not a lack of coverage that bothers me, it is an ingnorance of the smaller boat builder - What do you class as a small boat builder???
I do not think Eco Cats are a small boat builder (unless you class the size of their boats) on the contrary they are quite large and popular with those that do not mind what they are looking at (the fashion conscious on the other hand do) and are extremely economical. PowerCats are (to my knowledge) a smaller boat builder, who's design are excellent and there are MotorCats, who IMHO are the market leader when it comes to styling and efficiency combined. Take the RIBcat for instance (I may be bias around about now), it is a great looking boat, which utilises a Hydrofoil - which means it only needs small engines (tein 50-70hp) to reach similar speeds to that of a similar sized monohull that would need one or two large engines (100 hp plus) to reach the same speeds. This is where your fuel efficiency comes in, smaller engines doing the same speed - you will go further i.e. more miles per gallon (I reckon around 30% further - needs to be tested though) You have not comprimised anything at all other than using less fuel to go further.
On the other hand, if we were to fit an inboard diesel, apart from losing some storage space, I would bet that the RIBcat would go even further, the weight of the engine may slow it down so you might have to use two small diesels but the fact remains Cats go further (so you don't have to - thats an advert somewhere) on less fuel, less weight etc....
--------------------
Have a Look!! www.ribcats.com or www.sailroom.co.uk
|
KevB
regular
Reged: 04/07/2001
Posts: 5556
Loc: London
|
|
I wouldn't buy one cause they look terrible. Now if they looked like the Lagoons........
--------------------
Nirvana
|
DaCostaLot
regular
Reged: 25/01/2006
Posts: 392
Loc: Hampshire, Wickham
|
|
Sailing vs Power
--------------------
Have a Look!! www.ribcats.com or www.sailroom.co.uk
|
jrb1978
regular
Reged: 04/04/2005
Posts: 7924
Loc: ality Unknown
|
|
I think Kev was thinking of the lagoon power:
--------------------
|
DaCostaLot
regular
Reged: 25/01/2006
Posts: 392
Loc: Hampshire, Wickham
|
|
Looking like lagoons
This is the point, they are not meant to look like a conventional powered Cat, they are supposed to look like/similar to a monohull attract that particular market, looks of a monuhull - economical as a CAT
Can you explain the anomily that there are some huge power catamaran builders in the US e.g. Glacier Bay, posting remarkable fuel consumption figures. In the UK we are continually complaining about high fuel prices and don't give enough coverage about this possible solution (one possible solution)??????
Forget the sheep ethic, which most new buyers follow - try something new!!!!
--------------------
Have a Look!! www.ribcats.com or www.sailroom.co.uk
|
Andrew_Fanner
regular
Reged: 13/03/2002
Posts: 5600
Loc: ked into poverty by children
|
|
Do US marinas roast cat owners on mooring fees?
--------------------
Two beers please, my friend is paying.
|
LeytonC
regular
Reged: 16/09/2002
Posts: 1738
|
|
in fareness - the victorasprey cats are not that beamy - certainly not like normal sailing cats i have seen, that are wider than they are long!!
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
