|
|
Arctic Shipping
|
|
I am doing a research on marine transportation in the Northwest Passage. I am wondering to what extent shipping companies are interested in using this new Arctic route, and why. So far, a few told me they were interested, but many said no.
|
Shorter distance
|
|
|
High insurance costs
|
|
|
Just in time constraints
|
|
|
Lower fuel costs
|
|
|
Hazards of drifting ice
|
|
|
No market on the way
|
|
|
Too expensive to build ice-strenghtened ship
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Arctic Shipping
|
|
I was just pondering, theoretically, Global Warming will open the route more.
|
|
Minn
|
|
(regular)
|
|
01/08/2008 00:08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Arctic Shipping
|
|
With respect, you've missed something very important.
The NW Passage is shallow!
|
|
|
Re: Arctic Shipping
|
|
but ice strengthened tankers have transitted in the past - albeit with ice-breaker accompaniment.
|
|
|
Re: Arctic Shipping
|
|
How shallow?
|
|
|
Re: Arctic Shipping
|
|
A good idea, but impractical for the vast majority of shipping. Many charter parties and insurance policies forbid passage in high lattitudes. Often to the extent that a longer route is taken to avoid these lattitudes. A common one is to take a rhumb line, or composite great circle between the USA/Canada and the far east, to avoid passing north of the alutians.
An exciting prospect though!
|