FredericLasserre
new user
Reged: 14/05/2008
Posts: 1
|
|
I am doing a research on marine transportation in the Northwest Passage.
I am wondering to what extent shipping companies are interested in using this new Arctic route, and why. So far, a few told me they were interested, but many said no.
|
Shorter distance
|
|
|
High insurance costs
|
|
|
Just in time constraints
|
|
|
Lower fuel costs
|
|
|
Hazards of drifting ice
|
|
|
No market on the way
|
|
|
Too expensive to build ice-strenghtened ship
|
|
|
|
|
SirSnoozalot
regular
Reged: 25/05/2008
Posts: 828
Loc: East Coast UK
|
|
I was just pondering, theoretically, Global Warming will open the route more.
|
Minn
regular
Reged: 23/07/2008
Posts: 13
|
|
With respect, you've missed something very important.
The NW Passage is shallow!
|
philip_stevens
regular
Reged: 16/05/2001
Posts: 2396
Loc: near Saint Ives, Cornwall
|
|
but ice strengthened tankers have transitted in the past - albeit with ice-breaker accompaniment.
--------------------
regards,
Philip
Westerly Owners Association website
http://www.sub-spaced.com
Visit MarinaSkip now
|
SirSnoozalot
regular
Reged: 25/05/2008
Posts: 828
Loc: East Coast UK
|
|
How shallow?
|
robstracey
regular
Reged: 27/04/2002
Posts: 313
Loc: North Shields, Tyne and Wear.
|
|
A good idea, but impractical for the vast majority of shipping. Many charter parties and insurance policies forbid passage in high lattitudes. Often to the extent that a longer route is taken to avoid these lattitudes. A common one is to take a rhumb line, or composite great circle between the USA/Canada and the far east, to avoid passing north of the alutians.
An exciting prospect though!
--------------------
Rob.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
