boatone
regular
Reged: 29/07/2001
Posts: 6846
Loc: Surrey uk
|
|
Quote:
2. The meeting was also attended by representatives of Maidenhead Rowing Club, the Inland Waterways, Thames Awash commercial boat users and a working Lock Keeper from the Thames Valley.
Dunno why you need to be so secretive about the source - I will assume it came from Theresa May's website as its there verbatim (although not a press release.)
Anyway, doesnt that list of representaitives say it all about the totally disorganised state of interested river parties? Who decided who to invite?
I'd never heard of Thames Awash before, had you? Apparently part of the National Flood Forum - website HERE
Who are the 'Inland Waterways' ?
Maidenhead Rowing Club ???? aaahhh Theresa's constituency 
Pretty balanced set of viewpoints then?
--------------------
"Don't tell me why not, tell me how..."
ThamesBlog
|
Chris_d
regular
Reged: 15/06/2001
Posts: 1617
Loc: Oxfordshire
|
|
Your right its a strange gathering surprised some of the RUG group didn't get there, however a surprisingly positive outcome even if some of the reasoning was flawed.
|
JECuk
regular
Reged: 22/01/2008
Posts: 254
Loc: Mid-Thames
|
|
Glad my MP Goodman went. He isn't keen on EDMs apparently but said he would get involved.
--------------------
Lady Gay
|
teddington_lock
regular
Reged: 23/10/2007
Posts: 300
|
|
Quote:
And only about half the Thames based MP's and the Early Day motion has only attracted 22 MP's signatures thus far..........
Early Day Motion has 34 signatures ( as of the 4th ) , perhaps 12 more signed up overnight ?
Still a very small percentage though of total MPs.
Taylor, Ian
Bottomley, Peter
Hopkins, Kelvin
Dismore, Andrew
Hancock, Mike
Prentice, Gordon
Simpson, Alan
Jones, Lynne
Meale, Alan
Cryer, Ann
Vis, Rudi
Pope, Greg
Moss, Malcolm
Drew, David
Evans, Nigel
Wareing, Robert N
Main, Anne
Mates, Michael
Oaten, Mark
Wright, Tony
Davies, Dai
May, Theresa
Mercer, Patrick
Scott, Lee
Salter, Martin
Luff, Peter
MacKay, Andrew
Cable, Vincent
Caton, Martin
Etherington, Bill
Hamilton, David
Battle, John
Walter, Robert
Farron, Timothy
|
Brayman
regular
Reged: 27/11/2006
Posts: 1352
Loc: Bucks
|
|
Quote:
Your right its a strange gathering surprised some of the RUG group didn't get there, however a surprisingly positive outcome even if some of the reasoning was flawed.
I was also surprised that no ATYC/RUG members seem to get there. BUT, at least some action going forward.
--------------------
How come I am over the hill but I never made it to the top?
http://www.braycruiserclub.co.uk
|
boatone
regular
Reged: 29/07/2001
Posts: 6846
Loc: Surrey uk
|
|
Apparently, the EA were represented by Peter Quornby, EA South East Area Manager, Eileen McKeever and Jill Anderson, HR Manager Thames Region.
No EA 'senior management' so one has to ask if Thames were being lambs to the slaughter or somebody further up didn't feel it was important enough to field the big guns?
--------------------
"Don't tell me why not, tell me how..."
ThamesBlog
|
Bilgediver
regular
Reged: 06/06/2001
Posts: 1468
Loc: Scotland
|
|
Sounds like the Nits at the EA didn t do their homework and shot themselves in the foot !!!!
--------------------
Eastern Scotland and beyond.
|
JECuk
regular
Reged: 22/01/2008
Posts: 254
Loc: Mid-Thames
|
|
Goodman has signed the EDM now and asked this question in the House on 5 June:
Mr. Paul Goodman (Wycombe) (Con): The Leader of the House will have read early-day motion 1587, which was tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Esher and Walton (Mr. Taylor) and is about the proposed sale by the Environment Agency of 22 lock-keepers’ houses along the Thames.
[That this House is concern ed about the Environment Agency’ s proposal to dispose by sale or letting of 22 lock-keepers’ homes along the Thames; recognises the importance of lock-keepers being resident in homes adjacent to locks to maintain safety on the river; fears for the welfare of the lock-keepers and their families; and calls on the Government to ask the Environment Agency to re-examine its decision so as to protect this unique part of the nation’ s river heritage and the tradition of lock-keepers living at the site of locks.]
Will the Leader of the House find time for a debate on the motion so that those of us with constituencies adjoining the Thames can express constituents’ concern about the effect of that proposal on river users, lock-keepers and their families, safety and the social ecology of the Thames?
--------------------
Lady Gay
|
boatone
regular
Reged: 29/07/2001
Posts: 6846
Loc: Surrey uk
|
|
To which the Leader of the House replied:
Ms Harman: I note the points that the hon. Gentleman has made and suggest that he considers requesting a debate in Westminster Hall or on the Adjournment of the House.
I think that means 'no' as opposed to 'NO'.
--------------------
"Don't tell me why not, tell me how..."
ThamesBlog
|
JECuk
regular
Reged: 22/01/2008
Posts: 254
Loc: Mid-Thames
|
|
It means he can call for a ballot on whether to allow a debate. Yes, a soft no.
--------------------
Lady Gay
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
