If the weights are correct. For reasons I dont understand, the weight of their boat appears to some people to be, like the size of their willy, the length of the fish they caught, the speed of their car etc, a reason for exaggeration. The heavier the better.
See it all the time at our club. Recently had the owner of a Moody 346 telling me that his boat weighed 12 tonnes and not the 4 tonnes than my more modern Moody 336 weighed.
Often the exaggeration comes from taking seriously the weights given out by crane drivers and then rounding up.
In short I would ignore what people say about boat weights and instead use the www data or just guess.
Results 91 to 98 of 98
Thread: Fisher 46 - First in 15 years!
-
03-09-09, 09:27 #91
Registered User
-
Location : south wales
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 1,043
-
03-09-09, 10:25 #92
Registered User
-
Location : Cambridgeshire
- Join Date
- Feb 2002
- Posts
- 3,693
-
03-09-09, 13:44 #93
Registered User
-
Location : Warwickshire home/ Pembrokeshire boat
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 1,639
Accurate weights?
I wonder how many boats have been accurately weighed? Manufacturers' stated displacements, particularly for older boats, seem likely to be very approximate.
Our own boat (24 years old) has a builder's stated displacement of 5.7 tons. But the same boat with a very small sugarscoop platform added is said to displace 6.4 tons. As the two models are otherwise almost identical I find it hard to believe that sticking on an 11" platform, which doesn't even extend the waterline length, adds threequarters of a ton.
When recently lifted by crane, with no mast and with empty tanks, the crane registered 7.2 tons. Deducting a small amount for the slings produces a figure enormously at odds with stated displacement.
What other practical methods exist for assessing actual displacement?
-
03-09-09, 13:58 #94
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 15,322
Calculating the underwater volume of the hull will give you the volume/weight of the water displaced. However, complicated calculation given the shape of a boat. So most older boats were "guessed" at for a number of reasons - difficulty of calculation, belief of many that weight was good so the more the better, and poor controls over building process. Then add all the clobber added over the years (easily a ton or more on a 30-35ft cruiser) and you can see how far out you can be.
Modern designs usually have more accurate displacements because the 'puter does it for you. But you still need to know if it is light or in cruising trim . For example my boat has a design displacement (light) of 5360kg. Just filling the fuel and water tanks adds over 400kg or 8% to that - before I add the beer etc. I would estimate the ready to go displacement at about 6500kg.
-
03-09-09, 19:50 #95
-
05-09-09, 21:20 #96
Registered User
-
Location : Warwickshire home/ Pembrokeshire boat
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 1,639
-
05-09-09, 22:37 #97
Registered User
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 15,322
-
09-09-09, 15:57 #98
Welcome to the forum.
I agree it's a beautiful boat; however, my allegiances switched after a visit aboard a Nauticat 44. http://www.nauticat.com/Default.aspx?Id=436151&BoatId=8
However if pushed I would opt for this : http://www.yachtmonalisa.com/
John



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks