adrianm
regular
Reged: 16/05/2001
Posts: 526
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
01/09/2007 08:34
|
|
|
As I've stated here before the whole thing was handled incorrectly from the start.
It was pointless trying to fight to keep the derogation as it was completely indefenceable in the current climate.
Instead we should have been fighting to keep road duty levels of taxation off our fuel right from the start. Now it just looks like sour grapes.
|
|
First, state your conclusion
|
Wight_Dawn
|
31/08/2007 16:33
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
Sneds
|
31/08/2007 18:32
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
wotayottie
|
12/01/2008 22:31
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
Sneds
|
13/01/2008 20:27
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
Goboatingnow
|
18/01/2008 11:08
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
Callisto
|
15/09/2007 22:57
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
shauncol
|
05/11/2007 23:58
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
philip_stevens
|
31/08/2007 20:51
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
shauncol
|
05/11/2007 23:55
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
rubberduck
|
31/08/2007 21:06
|
Re: First, state your conclusion
|
adrianm
|
01/09/2007 08:34
|
|
0 registered and 0 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: danfoley
Print Thread
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
Mark-up is enabled
|
Rating:
Thread views: 4032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|